Arguments for and Against Corporate Social Responsibility
Corporate social responsibility is a business’s concern for the welfare of society. This concern is displayed by managers who take into consideration the long-term interests of the company and the company’s relationship with the society it which it operates.
A new theory in social responsibility is sustainability. Sustainability is the concept that companies that are socially responsible will outperform their peers or competitors by concentrating on society’s problems, seeing them as opportunities for profit building and aiding the world at the same time.
Sustainability also includes the notion that companies cannot thrive for very long in a world where billions of people are suffering and desperately poor. Therefore, it is in a company’s best interest to find ways to solve society’s problems. Along with this theory is the belief that only businesses have access to the talent, creativity, executive ability, and capital to make a difference.
Today, few people argue that corporate social responsibility is important. Instead, people debate about the degree and forms of social responsibility in which businesses should engage.
Arguments Against Corporate Social Responsibility
Skeptics often claim that businesses should focus on profits and let the government or nonprofit organizations deal with social and environmental issues.
Milton Friedman claimed that free markets, rather than companies, should decide what is best for the world. He believes that Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” will do all the work to make everything better.
Another argument is that companies are meant to create products or provide services rather than handle welfare activities. They do not have the expertise or knowledge necessary for handling social problems. Also, if managers are concentrating on social responsibilities, they are not performing their primary duties for the company at full capacity.
Finally, being socially responsible damage a company in the global marketplace. Cleaning up the environment, ensuring product safety, and donating money or time for welfare issues all raise company costs. In the end, this cost will be passed on to the consumer through the final prices of the product or service. While some customers may be willing to pay more for a product from a company that is socially responsible, others might not be. This can place a company at an economic disadvantage.
Arguments for Corporate Social Responsibility
The simplest argument for social responsibility is that it is the right thing to do. Some of society’s problems have been created by corporations such as pollution and poverty-level wages. It is the ethical responsibility of business to correct these wrongs.
Another point is that businesses have many of the resources needed for solving society’s problems and they should use them to do so.
Another reason for companies to be socially responsible is that if businesses are not, then the government will create new regulations and establish fines against corporations. This has especially been the case for the pollution issue.
If businesses police themselves, they can avoid government intervention. Finally, social responsibility can be profitable. It is possible for companies to prosper and build shareholder value by working to solve social problems. It can be a great way for a company to build positive public relations and attract top talent in the industry.
This article is accurate and true to the best of the author’s knowledge. Content is for informational or entertainment purposes only and does not substitute for personal counsel or professional advice in business, financial, legal, or technical matters.